You need to start from a tiny group of people that might benefit from your product or service. Yet you want to be highly practical on a day to day basis. We all like the grandiose project to conquer the world. The first objective is to start very small. In the book Zero to One, Peter Thiel also explains how – in theory – to build a monopoly.
#First mover advantage how to
How? How to build a monopoly in four steps The secret then is to be the last mover but then make sure you create a monopoly. In the end, being the first mover doesn’t mean anything if you’re not able to build any of those factors into your business.
He suggests to look at four main aspects: Second, the ability of that business to generate future cash flows. First, the ability to monopolize the market. In fact, what he means is that – this is true for the tech world – the ability of a company to be the dominant player depends upon two main things. Will this business be around a decade from now? As he explains, when looking for a successful business one should ask: In Zero to One by Peter Thiel, there is a whole chapter on the last mover advantage. So the first mover that seemed a giant will soon become the dwarf. At the same time, you can also look at what they’ve done right to copy it! In this scenario, when growth picks up the effect of it will be more than exponential. In fact, if you are entering the market, you can do it by looking at what your competitors have done wrong. This means that when the last mover arrives on the market, it has one of the most important assets you can have in business: your competitors’ mistakes.
The end nodes can be computers, servers and/or connecting users. For example, if a network has 10 nodes, its inherent value is 100 (10 * 10). Metcalfe’s Law states that a network’s impact is the square of the number of nodes in the network. Metcalfe’s Law is a concept used in computer networks and telecommunications to represent the value of a network. Who can afford to compete with that? Why Metcalfe’s law like so much the last mover Why? Well, Google arrived last, but it built a monopoly able to capture most of the market value. Only to disappear by the turn of the century. In fact, in the 90s Netscape held 90% of the browser market. When he got in the search market, it wasn’t the first. But also market dominance isn’t enough if you’re not able to capture enough profits to be able to acquire or kick out the latest comers. Indeed, if you failed to gain traction and conquer market dominance, chances are you’ll be kicked out by the last comers. When you’re the first mover, you’re seen as bold. We learned that when starting a company being right and too early is the same as being wrong.
Segways, and websites like Six Degrees or services like Webvan, we saw the stumbling start of great ideas that were ahead of their time. This makes the last comer, who makes the last move in the position to dominate the market. My argument is that – first movers not only are not supposed to win, but they might have a few drawbacks that make their moves very risky. I’m talking about the last mover advantage. There is another part of it, which makes less noise and might sound less appealing but in the real business world is more accurate than the conventional first-mover advantage story. This is the conventional part of the story business professors like to teach so much. As the story goes, when you’re the first to enter a market things like branding recognition, economies of scale, and switching costs allow the first player to retain that advantage for a long time. When you get into business school, one of the first principles they teach you is about the story of the first-mover advantage.
0 kommentar(er)
